Metro vs Rugby - Neighbourhood Comparison
Side-by-side comparison across safety, property values, schools, healthcare, civic responsiveness, and transport. Data sourced from official government records.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Metro | Rugby |
|---|---|---|
| Safety score | 7/100 | 7/100 |
| Risk profile | Higher reported crime | Higher reported crime |
| Median property valuation | N/A | R900K |
| Property value percentile | N/A | 39% |
| Valuation growth (CAGR) | N/A | 4.9% |
| Schools | 0 | 1 |
| Matric pass rate | N/A | N/A |
| Healthcare facilities within 5 km | 11 | 11 |
| Nearest healthcare facility | 0.5 km | 0.4 km |
| Civic responsiveness percentile | 34% | 86% |
| Minibus taxi routes | 43 | 160 |
Green indicates the higher-performing value per metric. Safety scores are relative indices - not absolute safety measures. Property valuations are from the CCT General Valuation Roll 2022, not market transaction prices.
Key differences
- Rugby has more schools nearby (1), which may indicate greater educational choice.
Frequently asked questions
How does Metro compare to Rugby for safety?
Metro has a safety score of 7/100 (Higher reported crime), while Rugby scores 7/100 (Higher reported crime). These are relative indices based on reported crime - not absolute measures of safety.
Which suburb has higher property values - Metro or Rugby?
Property valuation data is not available for both suburbs.
What schools are near Metro and Rugby?
Metro has 0 schools nearby, while Rugby has 1. School data is sourced from the DBE EMIS masterlist.