Skip to main content

Killarney Gardens vs Racing Park - Neighbourhood Comparison

Side-by-side comparison across safety, property values, schools, healthcare, civic responsiveness, and transport. Data sourced from official government records.

Side-by-side metrics

Metric Killarney Gardens Racing Park
Safety score 7/100 26/100
Risk profile Higher reported crime Higher reported crime
Median property valuation N/A N/A
Property value percentile N/A N/A
Valuation growth (CAGR) N/A N/A
Schools 0 0
Matric pass rate N/A N/A
Healthcare facilities within 5 km 3 3
Nearest healthcare facility 1.0 km 0.8 km
Civic responsiveness percentile 10% 38%
Minibus taxi routes 115 64

Green indicates the higher-performing value per metric. Safety scores are relative indices - not absolute safety measures. Property valuations are from the CCT General Valuation Roll 2022, not market transaction prices.

Key differences

  • Racing Park has a higher safety score by 19 points. Safety scores are relative indices based on reported crime data and are not absolute measures of safety.

Frequently asked questions

How does Killarney Gardens compare to Racing Park for safety?

Killarney Gardens has a safety score of 7/100 (Higher reported crime), while Racing Park scores 26/100 (Higher reported crime). These are relative indices based on reported crime - not absolute measures of safety.

Which suburb has higher property values - Killarney Gardens or Racing Park?

Property valuation data is not available for both suburbs.

What schools are near Killarney Gardens and Racing Park?

Killarney Gardens has 0 schools nearby, while Racing Park has 0. School data is sourced from the DBE EMIS masterlist.

Related comparisons