Skip to main content

Cape Town Crime Trends: Q3 2025/26 Quarter-on-Quarter Analysis

Cape Town recorded 66,921 crimes in Q3 2025/26 (October-December 2025), up 2.0% from 65,593 in the same quarter a year earlier. The raw count increased, but the picture is more complex than a single number suggests.

When crimes are weighted by severity using the Crime Harm Index (where murder carries 5,475 harm-days and shoplifting carries 2), aggregate weighted harm across the metro decreased by 18.5%. The divergence between raw counts and weighted harm tells a specific story: serious violent crimes fell while lower-severity detection-dependent offences rose.

This post presents the data. It does not attribute causation. Crime trends are driven by complex, intersecting factors that a single quarter of statistics cannot isolate.

Data source: SAPS quarterly crime statistics, Q3 2025/2026 (October-December 2025), compared against Q3 2024/2025 (October-December 2024). All figures are reported crimes at precinct level. StreetSignal maps 734 of 744 suburbs to 63 SAPS precincts. Full methodology: streetsignal.co.za/methodology/.

What changed: crime categories

The most significant movements were in two directions simultaneously.

Categories that decreased (contact and property crimes):

CategoryQ3 2024Q3 2025Change
Burglary at non-residential premises656469-28.5%
Robbery at residential premises465352-24.3%
Carjacking642537-16.4%
Robbery with aggravating circumstances4,6893,960-15.5%
Burglary at residential premises2,9262,500-14.6%
Theft out of/from motor vehicle3,6393,290-9.6%
Murder937915-2.3%
Attempted murder767743-3.1%

Categories that increased (predominantly detection-dependent):

CategoryQ3 2024Q3 2025Change
Drug-related crime13,47416,922+25.6%
Illegal possession of firearms/ammunition609776+27.4%
Driving under the influence1,2391,454+17.4%
Crimen injuria1,1531,260+9.3%
Theft of motor vehicle828896+8.2%

A note on detection-dependent crimes: Drug arrests, firearms seizures, and DUI arrests are classified as “detection-dependent” because they primarily reflect policing activity rather than civilian reporting. An increase in drug-related crime does not necessarily mean more drug use; it may mean more police operations targeting drugs. This distinction is important when interpreting the data.

Murder: 915 lives lost

Murder decreased from 937 to 915 (-2.3%). Attempted murder decreased from 767 to 743 (-3.1%). These are the figures behind the Western Cape Government’s reported 3.4% provincial murder decrease.

A 2.3% decrease in murder is a factual improvement in the data. It is also 915 people who were killed in a single quarter in one metro. Both of these statements are true simultaneously.

Station-level changes

Of 63 SAPS precincts in the Cape Town metro, 27 recorded declining weighted harm (43%), 18 recorded stable levels (29%), and 18 recorded increasing weighted harm (29%).

Stations with the largest decreases in raw crime:

StationQ3 2024Q3 2025ChangeSuburbs served
Strandfontein313240-23.3%Strandfontein, Pelikan Park
Mowbray236195-17.4%Mowbray, Rosebank
Ocean View344287-16.6%Ocean View
Rondebosch250209-16.4%Rondebosch, Rosebank
Khayelitsha2,0351,737-14.6%Khayelitsha, Makhaza
Athlone1,3671,202-12.1%Athlone, Bridgetown

Stations with the largest increases in raw crime:

StationQ3 2024Q3 2025ChangeSuburbs served
Table View1,1861,470+23.9%Table View, Bloubergstrand
Elsies River1,1131,337+20.1%Elsies River
Bishop Lavis1,4421,718+19.1%Bishop Lavis
Ravensmead789934+18.4%Ravensmead
Lwandle700825+17.9%Lwandle
Mfuleni2,3852,733+14.6%Mfuleni

These are raw crime counts, not rates per capita. A station serving 100,000 residents recording 1,470 crimes has a different per-capita profile than one serving 10,000 residents recording 287 crimes. See individual suburb pages on StreetSignal for per-capita safety indices.

Why raw counts and weighted harm can tell different stories

Bishop Lavis recorded a 19.1% increase in raw crime counts but is classified as “Stable” on StreetSignal’s trend indicator. This is because StreetSignal’s trend is based on weighted harm (Crime Harm Index), not raw counts. If the increase was driven by lower-severity detection crimes (drugs, DUI) while serious contact crimes stayed flat, the weighted harm can remain stable even as raw counts rise.

This is a deliberate methodological choice. Raw crime counts treat a shoplifting and a murder as equal events. The Crime Harm Index does not. Neither approach is objectively correct; they answer different questions. StreetSignal presents both the harm-weighted safety index and the raw crime data on every suburb page.

What this data does not tell you

  1. Underreporting. SAPS data reflects reported crimes only. Stats SA’s Victims of Crime Survey consistently shows that a significant proportion of crimes go unreported, particularly sexual offences, assault, and theft. A suburb with low reported crime may have low actual crime, or it may have low reporting rates. The data cannot distinguish between these.

  2. Causation. A decrease at a specific station does not mean a specific intervention worked. A single quarter is insufficient to establish a trend. Crime statistics are influenced by policing intensity, reporting practices, socioeconomic conditions, seasonal patterns, and factors that precinct-level data cannot capture.

  3. Individual safety. A safety index is a statistical summary. It does not predict what will happen to any individual in any specific location. A suburb with a safety score of 90/100 still has crime. A suburb with a score of 10/100 still has residents who live without incident.

  4. Population accuracy. Per-capita rates depend on population denominators. SAPS station populations are estimates that may not reflect actual residential populations, particularly in areas with high transient populations or recent informal settlement growth.

Further reading

Search any suburb on StreetSignal to see its full safety profile, or compare suburbs side by side.

If this analysis was useful, consider supporting StreetSignal.

Buy me a coffee